Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkaleephan, Chutima
dc.contributor.authorKittitrakul, Chalermsak
dc.contributor.authorKessomboon, Nusaraporn
dc.contributor.authorKijtiwatchakul, Kannikar
dc.contributor.authorEksaengsri, Achara
dc.contributor.authorLimpananont, Jiraporn
dc.coverage.spatialIndiaen_US
dc.coverage.spatialMalaysiaen_US
dc.coverage.spatialThailanden_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-16T09:39:33Z
dc.date.available2024-07-16T09:39:33Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-27
dc.identifier.urihttps://resources.equityinitiative.org/handle/ei/550
dc.description.abstractThis article comprehensively reviews and analyses knowledge and information relating to international trade agreements and their implications during the past 17 years, both within and external to Thailand. To reveal the implications and impact systematically, the conceptual framework for analysis was drafted and the implications were mapped along the medicine value chain. The mapping shows cross-link of the implications and took concerns of health sectors. Focusing on medicines, despite of positive impact, international trade agreements have had significant negative impacts on the Thai medicine system. There is worldwide recognition that expensive prices and higher expenditure of medicines result from the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS); this research identified further implications including: the opening up of market access to government procurement and limitations on policy space for medicine management systems as well as public health. This paper also demonstrates the experiences of Thailand, India and Malaysia regarding TRIPS flexibilities. It was shown that all three countries exercised “other use without authorization of the right holder”, which is a TRIPS flexibility, to strike the balance between individual right and obligation in access to affordable essential medicines, although difficulties and consequences were found in the process of exercising this right. Evidence shows that Thailand, as a developing country, may support the voluntary license but must keep all TRIPS flexibilities, including the compulsory license, as tool to overcome barriers to access and ensure the human right to health. Further system research as well as investigation of cross-country impact of FTAs in and among ASEAN members are recommended.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).en_US
dc.subjectinternational trade agreement
dc.subjectimplication
dc.subjectmedicine
dc.subjectexpenditure
dc.subjectcompulsory license
dc.subjectimpact
dc.subjectgovernment use of license
dc.subjectvoluntary license
dc.titleInternational Trade Agreements and Impact on the Medicine System: Causal Relations?en_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen accessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright (c) 2020 Journal of Health Science - วารสารวิชาการสาธารณสุขen_US
mods.genreJournal articleen_US
oaire.citationTitleJournal of Health Scienceen_US
oaire.citationVolume29en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record