• Login
    View Item 
    •   EI Resource Hub
    • 4. EI Fellow Publications and Resources
    • 2016 fellows
    • Chalermsak Kittitrakul
    • View Item
    •   EI Resource Hub
    • 4. EI Fellow Publications and Resources
    • 2016 fellows
    • Chalermsak Kittitrakul
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EI Resource HubCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateBy Submit DateResource TypesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateBy Submit DateResource TypesAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    International Trade Agreements and Impact on the Medicine System: Causal Relations?

    Akaleephan, Chutima
    Kittitrakul, Chalermsak
    Kessomboon, Nusaraporn
    Kijtiwatchakul, Kannikar
    Eksaengsri, Achara
    Limpananont, Jiraporn
    2020-01-27

    This article comprehensively reviews and analyses knowledge and information relating to international trade agreements and their implications during the past 17 years, both within and external to Thailand. To reveal the implications and impact systematically, the conceptual framework for analysis was drafted and the implications were mapped along the medicine value chain. The mapping shows cross-link of the implications and took concerns of health sectors. Focusing on medicines, despite of positive impact, international trade agreements have had significant negative impacts on the Thai medicine system. There is worldwide recognition that expensive prices and higher expenditure of medicines result from the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS); this research identified further implications including: the opening up of market access to government procurement and limitations on policy space for medicine management systems as well as public health. This paper also demonstrates the experiences of Thailand, India and Malaysia regarding TRIPS flexibilities. It was shown that all three countries exercised “other use without authorization of the right holder”, which is a TRIPS flexibility, to strike the balance between individual right and obligation in access to affordable essential medicines, although difficulties and consequences were found in the process of exercising this right. Evidence shows that Thailand, as a developing country, may support the voluntary license but must keep all TRIPS flexibilities, including the compulsory license, as tool to overcome barriers to access and ensure the human right to health. Further system research as well as investigation of cross-country impact of FTAs in and among ASEAN members are recommended.

    international trade agreement
    implication
    medicine
    expenditure
    compulsory license
    impact
    government use of license
    voluntary license
    Journal article
    Text
    application/pdf
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
    Open access
    Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Health Science - วารสารวิชาการสาธารณสุข
    https://resources.equityinitiative.org/handle/ei/550
    Show full item record
    International Trade Agreements and Impact on the Medicine System.pdf

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Collections
    • Chalermsak Kittitrakul [2]

    DISCOVER

    WHO WE ARE

    WHAT WE DO

    HOW TO APPLY

    COMMUNITY

    OUR FELLOWS

    OUR NEWS

    HOW TO JOIN

    CONTACT US

    BANGKOK

    CMB USA

    © The Equity Initiative is a program of CMB Foundation. Copyright 2016 All rights reserved.

    ‹›×