• Login
    View Item 
    •   EI Resource Hub
    • 1. Health Equity
    • 1.02 Policies & Actions
    • 1.02.02 Health in All Policies
    • View Item
    •   EI Resource Hub
    • 1. Health Equity
    • 1.02 Policies & Actions
    • 1.02.02 Health in All Policies
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EI Resource HubCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateBy Submit DateResource TypesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateBy Submit DateResource TypesAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods

    Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health
    Lee, Janice
    Schram, Ashley
    Riley, Emily
    Harris, Patrick
    Baum, Fran
    Fisher, Matt
    Freeman, Toby
    Friel, Sharon
    2018-02-06
    Kerman University of Medical Sciences

    Background: Epidemiological evidence on the social determinants of health inequity is well-advanced, but considerably less attention has been given to evaluating the impact of public policies addressing those social determinants. Methodological challenges to produce evidence on policy outcomes present a significant barrier to mobilising policy actions for health equities. This review aims to examine methodological approaches to policy evaluation of health equity outcomes and identify promising approaches for future research. Methods: We conducted a systematic narrative review of literature critically evaluating policy impact on health equity, synthesizing information on the methodological approaches used. We searched and screened records from five electronic databases, using pre-defined protocols resulting in a total of 50 studies included for review. We coded the studies according to (1) type of policy analysed; (2) research design; (3) analytical techniques; (4) health outcomes; and (5) equity dimensions evaluated. Results: We found a growing number of a wide range of policies being evaluated for health equity outcomes using a variety of research designs. The majority of studies employed an observational research design, most of which were cross-sectional, however, other approaches included experimental designs, simulation modelling, and meta-analysis. Regression techniques dominated the analytical approaches, although a number of novel techniques were used which may offer advantages over traditional regression analysis for the study of distributional impacts of policy. Few studies made intra-national or cross-national comparisons or collected primary data. Despite longstanding challenges of attribution in policy outcome evaluation, the majority of the studies attributed change in physical or mental health outcomes to the policy being evaluated. Conclusion: Our review provides an overview of methodological approaches to health equity policy outcome evaluation, demonstrating what is most commonplace and opportunities from novel approaches. We found the number of studies evaluating the impacts of public policies on health equity are on the rise, but this area of policy evaluation still requires more attention given growing inequities.

    Policy Evaluation
    Methodology
    Health Inequities
    Social Determinants of Health
    journalArticle
    581-592 p.
    application/pdf
    © 2018 The Author(s)
    https://resources.equityinitiative.org/handle/ei/231
    Show full item record
    2018 Lee IJHPM_Action on SDH.pdf

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Collections
    • 1.02.02 Health in All Policies [51]

    DISCOVER

    WHO WE ARE

    WHAT WE DO

    HOW TO APPLY

    COMMUNITY

    OUR FELLOWS

    OUR NEWS

    HOW TO JOIN

    CONTACT US

    BANGKOK

    CMB USA

    © The Equity Initiative is a program of CMB Foundation. Copyright 2016 All rights reserved.

    ‹›×