Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhao, Yang
dc.contributor.authorAnindya, Kanya
dc.contributor.authorAtun, Rifat
dc.contributor.authorMarthias, Tiara
dc.contributor.authorHan, Chunlei
dc.contributor.authorMcPake, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorDuolikun, Nadila
dc.contributor.authorHulse, Emily
dc.contributor.authorFang, Xinyue
dc.contributor.authorDing, Yimin
dc.contributor.authorOldenburg, Brian
dc.contributor.authorLee, John Tayu
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-13T03:08:10Z
dc.date.available2024-08-13T03:08:10Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://resources.equityinitiative.org/handle/ei/642
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aims to examine (1) province-level variations in the levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and behavioral risk for CVDs, (2) province-level variations in the management of cascade of care for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia, and (3) the association of province-level economic development and individual factors with the quality of care for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia. Methods: We used nationally representative data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study in 2015, which included 12,597 participants aged 45 years. Using a care cascade framework, we examined the quality of care provided to patients with three prevalent NCDs: hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia. The proportion of WHO CVD risk based on the World Health Organization CVD risk prediction charts, Cardiovascular Risk Score (CRS) and Behavior Risk Score (BRS) were calculated. We performed multivariable logistic regression models to determine the individual-level drivers of NCD risk variables and outcomes. To examine socio-demographic relationships with CVD risk, linear regression models were applied. Results: In total, the average CRS was 4.98 (95% CI: 4.92, 5.05), while the average BRS was 3.10 (95% confidence interval: 3.04, 3.15). The weighted mean CRS (BRS) in Fujian province ranged from 4.36 to 5.72 (P < 0.05). Most of the provinces had a greater rate of hypertension than diabetes and dyslipidaemia awareness and treatment. Northern provinces had a higher rate of awareness and treatment of all three diseases. Similar patterns of regional disparity were seen in diabetes and dyslipidaemia care cascades. There was no evidence of a better care cascade for CVDs in patients who reside in more economically advanced provinces. Conclusion: Our research found significant provincial heterogeneity in the CVD risk scores and the management of the cascade of care for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia for persons aged 45 years or more. To improve the management of cascade of care and to eliminate regional and disparities in CVD care and risk factors in China, local and population-based focused interventions are necessary.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0).en_US
dc.subjectcardiovascular diseaseen_US
dc.subjectbehavior risken_US
dc.subjectcare cascadeen_US
dc.subjectregional disparityen_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.titleProvincial heterogeneity in the management of care cascade for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia in China: Analysis of nationally representative population-based surveyen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen accessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright (c) 2022 Zhao, Anindya, Atun, Marthias, Han, McPake, Duolikun, Hulse, Fang, Ding, Oldenburg and Lee.en_US
mods.genreResearch paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record