Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTan, Si Ying
dc.contributor.authorFoo, Chuan De
dc.contributor.authorVerma, Monica
dc.contributor.authorHanvoravongchai, Piya
dc.contributor.authorCheh, Paul Li Jen
dc.contributor.authorPholpark, Aungsumalee
dc.contributor.authorMarthias, Tiara
dc.contributor.authorHafidz, Firdaus
dc.contributor.authorPutri, Likke Prawidya
dc.contributor.authorMahendradhata, Yodi
dc.contributor.authorGiang, Kim Bao
dc.contributor.authorNachuk, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hong
dc.contributor.authorLim, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorLegido-Quigley, Helena
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-13T02:26:08Z
dc.date.available2024-08-13T02:26:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://resources.equityinitiative.org/handle/ei/639
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic had an inequitable and disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations, reversing decades of progress toward healthy populations and poverty alleviation. This study examines various programmatic tools and policy measures used by governments to support vulnerable populations during the pandemic. A comparative case study of 15 countries representing all World Health Organization's regions offers a comprehensive picture of countries with varying income statuses, health system arrangements and COVID-19 public health measures. Through a systematic desk review and key informant interviews, we report a spectrum of mitigation strategies deployed in these countries to address five major types of vulnerabilities (health, economic, social, institutional and communicative). We found a multitude of strategies that supported vulnerable populations such as migrant workers, sex workers, prisoners, older persons and school-going children. Prioritising vulnerable populations during the early phase of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, direct financial subsidies and food assistance programmes were the most common measures reported. Additionally, framing public health information and implementing culturally sensitive health promotion interventions helped bridge the communication barriers in certain instances. However, these measures remain insufficient to protect vulnerable populations comprehensively. Our findings point to the need to expand fiscal space for health, enlarge healthcare coverage, incorporate equity principles in all policies, leverage technology, multi-stakeholder co-production of policies and tailored community engagement mechanisms.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).en_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectVulnerable populationen_US
dc.subjectImpactsen_US
dc.subjectMitigation strategyen_US
dc.subjectEquityen_US
dc.titleMitigating the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable populations: Lessons for improving health and social equityen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen accessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright (c) 2023 Tan et al.en_US
mods.genreJournalen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record