Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnindya, Kanya
dc.contributor.authorMarthias, Tiara
dc.contributor.authorVellakkal, Sukumar
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorAtun, Rifat
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Alison
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Yang
dc.contributor.authorHulse, Emily SG
dc.contributor.authorMcPake, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorLee, John Tayu
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-09T08:19:17Z
dc.date.available2024-08-09T08:19:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-07
dc.identifier.urihttps://resources.equityinitiative.org/handle/ei/637
dc.description.abstractBackground: Reducing socioeconomic inequalities in access to good quality health care is key for countries to achieve Universal Health Coverage. This study aims to assess socioeconomic inequalities in effective coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: Using the most recent national health surveys from 39 LMICs (between 2014 and 2018), we calculated coverage indicators using effective coverage care cascade that consists of service contact, crude coverage, quality-adjusted coverage, and user-adherence-adjusted coverage. We quantified wealth-related and education-related inequality using the relative index of inequality, slope index of inequality, and concentration index. Findings: The quality-adjusted coverage of RMNCH services in 39 countries was substantially lower than service contact, in particular for postnatal care (64 percentage points [pp], p-value<0·0001), family planning (48·7 pp, p<0·0001), and antenatal care (43·6 pp, p<0·0001) outcomes. Upper-middle-income countries had higher effective coverage levels compared with low- and lower-middle-income countries in family planning, antenatal care, delivery care, and postnatal care. Socioeconomic inequalities tend to be wider when using effective coverage measurement compared with crude and service contact measurements. Our findings show that upper-middle-income countries had a lower magnitude of inequality compared with low- and lower-middle-income countries. Interpretation: Reliance on the average contact coverage tends to underestimate the levels of socioeconomic inequalities for RMNCH service use in LMICs. Hence, the effective coverage measurement using a care cascade approach should be applied. While RMNCH coverages vary considerably across countries, equitable improvement in quality of care is particularly needed for lower-middle-income and low-income countries. Funding: None.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0).en_US
dc.subjectEffective coverageen_US
dc.subjectreproductiveen_US
dc.subjectmaternalen_US
dc.subjectneonatalen_US
dc.subjectchild healthen_US
dc.subjectsocioeconomic inequalitiesen_US
dc.subjectlow-income countriesen_US
dc.subjectmiddle-income countriesen_US
dc.titleSocioeconomic inequalities in effective service coverage for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health: a comparative analysis of 39 low-income and middle-income countriesen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen accessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright (c) 2021 Anindya et al.en_US
mods.genreResearch paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record